Es geht um Bildung.

In http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2017/02/23/Steve-Bannon-Makes-His-Case-Economic-Nationalism-CPAC berichtet die The Fiscal Times über die Ziele der “Bewegung” aus Steve Bannons Sicht:

[...] Bannon described what he calls “economic nationalism” motivating President Donald Trump’s supporters.

Bannon’s said the new political order brings together populists, limited government conservatives, libertarians, and economic nationalists.

“The center core of what we believe is that we’re a nation with an economy. Not an economy just in some global marketplace with open borders but we are a nation with a culture and a reason for being,” he said. “I think that’s what unites us and I think that’s what’s going to unite this movement going forward.” [...]

The Fiscal Times ist ein Beispiel für seriösen Journalismus auf der eher “rechten” Seite des politischen Spektrums in den USA.

After Scott Pruitt became the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , Joaquín Guzmán seems to be the right candidate for heading the U. S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). However, the fact that he is Mexican might disqualify him.

See also: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-epa-idUSKBN15W131

ABC News host George Stephanopoulos interviewed Donals Trump’s advisor Stephen Miller. Watch Miller’s eyes. The advisor has his own advisors. He reads his answers from a teleprompter.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5qr6rx/just_confirmed_trump_has_accepted_angela_merkels/

www.whitehouse.gov -> briefing room -> presidential actions -> executive orders

See also: https://www.reddit.com/r/Trump_EO_Archive/

Against non-American Muslims: http://documents.latimes.com/protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states/

About EIR (Executive Intelligence Review), 1987, Vol. 14, Elephants & Donkeys column by Kathleen Klenetsky

SPIEGEL: Sie haben gesagt, Ihre größte Angst sei, dass Trumps Mannschaft während ihrer Regierungszeit die Nerven verlieren könnte. Was meinen Sie damit?
Gingrich: Es gibt so vieles, was Trumps Truppe bremsen oder stoppen könnte: die Bürokratie, die Vorschriften, die Lobbyisten, die Journalisten. Das Beharrungsvermögen all dieser Kräfte, die Veränderungen verhindern wollen, wird so stark sein, dass Trumps Regierung womöglich einen Gang herunterschaltet und irgendwenn beschließt, doch vernünftig zu werden. Und wenn er und seine Leute vernünftig werden, dann haben sie verloren.

DER SPIEGEL 3/2017, S. 89, Interview von Gordon Repinski mit Newt Gingrich

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trump-putin-and-the-big-hack

Trump, Putin, and the Big Hack

By David Remnick
January 6, 2017

[...] A declassified report concluded that Putin ordered a campaign of covert operations, from defamatory “fake news” articles about Clinton to the hack itself. [...]

[...] Like many nationalist politicians in Europe, Trump has made plain his admiration for Putin, complimenting the Russian leader’s “great control over his country,” while at the same time failing to address the reality that Putin’s regime has instituted wholesale censorship of television, increased repressive measures on ordinary citizens, and unleashed his forces in Ukraine and Syria. (Putin, of course, discounts criticism of his policies as Western hypocrisy and points to everything from the invasion of Iraq, which he opposed, to the eastward expansion of NATO, which he sees as an aggressive act.) [...]